The Facts About the Government Shutdown
The federal government is now in its 24th day of shutdown, with no agreement in sight. The dispute is not about foreign aid, social policy, or ideological “pet projects” — it’s about whether to extend middle-class health-care tax credits that make Affordable Care Act (ACA) coverage affordable for millions of Americans.
The Real Issue: Tax Credits, Not Foreign Aid
The Democratic-backed Continuing Resolution (CR) is a straightforward stop-gap bill that keeps federal spending at current 2025 levels — essentially a pause button for the budget — while Congress continues negotiations over a long-term funding plan.
The bill includes only minor exceptions, called “anomalies,” the most notable being $490.96 million for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, a renewal of the same amount approved in prior budgets. The Corporation for Public Broadcasting funding line has historically appeared in continuing resolutions as a standard technical renewal, not a new Democratic proposal. Despite viral claims online, the text of the CR contains no funding for Honduras, Zimbabwe, “feminist initiatives,” or LGBTQI+ democracy programs.
In short: the Democratic version of the CR contains no new foreign spending or partisan earmarks. What Democrats do want is to extend enhanced health-care tax credits first enacted through the American Rescue Plan Act (2021) and extended by the Inflation Reduction Act (2022).
These refundable tax credits — not subsidies or direct payments — lower the amount Americans pay for ACA insurance premiums each month. When the tax credit applies, the Treasury covers the remaining balance directly with insurers. Without renewal, these tax credits expire at the end of 2025, and millions of families could see premium increases of hundreds of dollars per month.
Democrats’ Position: Protect a Middle-Class Tax Cut
Democrats argue that allowing the credits to lapse would effectively raise costs for millions of working- and middle-class Americans. They describe the tax credits as a continuation of an existing tax cut, not new spending, and want to secure an extension now rather than gamble on later negotiations.
They’ve also criticized the process, saying Republican leaders presented the funding measure as a take-it-or-leave-it proposal without bipartisan input. Senate Democrats have repeatedly rejected the House-passed version, insisting that any short-term funding agreement should include the tax credit extension and protections against future Medicaid reductions.
Republicans’ Position: Keep It “Clean”
Speaker Mike Johnson and House Republicans say the shutdown could end immediately if Democrats agreed to pass a “clean” CR that extends funding at current levels with no policy changes attached.
Republicans argue that adding the health-care tax credit extension turns a stop-gap funding bill into a policy debate. They believe those tax credits — which cost an estimated $300 billion over ten years if made permanent — should be addressed in future budget negotiations, not within a temporary measure to keep the lights on.
In their view, Democrats are using the shutdown as leverage to pass what should be considered a new long-term entitlement expansion. Democrats respond that it’s simply maintaining existing tax relief for families who would otherwise face unaffordable premiums.
What the CR Actually Does
Despite heated rhetoric from both sides, the Continuing Resolution itself is relatively ordinary.
It funds the federal government at fiscal year 2025 levels until a future deadline and makes a few minor technical adjustments. Aside from the standard renewal for public broadcasting, there are no new line items for foreign aid or domestic programs.
These CRs do not list every individual program or project; they extend existing appropriations from prior years. That means any claims about new or ideological spending are not supported by the document itself.
Who Is Affected
The political standoff has tangible effects far beyond Washington:
- Nearly 900,000 federal workers remain furloughed, with another million working without pay.
- Federal services—including passport processing, small-business loans, and national park operations—are slowed or suspended.
- Families who rely on ACA coverage face growing uncertainty, as insurers warn of potential premium adjustments if the tax credit extension isn’t passed before open enrollment.
For many Americans, the debate may sound abstract, but its impact is concrete: whether health coverage stays affordable or costs climb when the current credits expire.
Why This Shutdown Is Different
Past shutdowns were about border funding, immigration, or overall spending limits. This one is about a technical yet consequential provision of tax law — a fight over how to define government spending itself.
Democrats call the health-care tax credits a middle-class tax cut that prevents families from losing coverage. Republicans call them an ongoing expense that should be reconsidered in a regular budget debate. Both agree on reopening the government — but not on when or how to settle this argument.
Until they do, the federal government stays partially closed, and the same health-care policy battle that has shaped American politics for more than a decade continues to stall it.
What do you think? Should Congress pass the clean funding bill now and debate the tax credits later, or should Democrats hold firm to protect middle-class health-care affordability before reopening the government? Share your thoughts in the comments below — we’ll feature a few of the most insightful replies in our next community update.

Pass the CR. The ARPA was said by Democrats at the time to “Temporary” act, No reason to shutdown the Govt.